Tax·Luxury

Part IV · Tax Regimes · No. 08

Annual wealth taxes

A small group of jurisdictions impose an annual tax on the net worth of resident individuals. The OECD member states that have such a tax today are far fewer than in the 1990s; the design problems are well understood; the political debate over reintroduction is constant.

The rule

A wealth tax is an annual tax on a taxpayer's net wealth — gross assets less liabilities — typically above a threshold. It is distinct from a one-time wealth tax (a capital levy), distinct from inheritance and estate tax (which is imposed once at transfer), and distinct from capital-gains tax (which is imposed on realized appreciation). The wealth tax reaches the stock of wealth, not the flow of income or the moment of transfer.

Jurisdictions that currently impose a wealth tax

As of October 2026, a general annual net-wealth tax exists in a small number of jurisdictions, with narrower asset-specific wealth taxes elsewhere:

Countries that have repealed their wealth tax in recent decades include France (repealed and replaced with a real-estate-specific wealth tax in 2018), Germany (the tax was held unconstitutional in 1995 and has not been reinstated), Sweden (repealed 2007), Denmark (repealed 1997), Austria (repealed 1993), and the Netherlands (replaced with a deemed-return income tax under Box 3 — currently under reform after Supreme Court decisions in 2021 and 2024).

Scope

A wealth tax typically reaches:

Common exclusions or reduced valuations:

Rate and computation

Rates are low in nominal terms compared with income tax — between approximately 0.1% and 3.5% per year on net wealth. The compounding effect over decades is material, but the headline rate is modest. Where the tax exists alongside an income tax with low top rate (Switzerland), the combined burden remains internationally competitive. Where the rate is high (Norway, Spain after the solidarity overlay), the combined burden of wealth tax plus income tax exceeds 50% of investment return for many high-net-worth residents.

The design problem of wealth tax is valuation. Cash and listed securities are easy. Closely held entities are difficult and produce constant disputes. Art and tangible property are valued on declared basis, with audit risk asymmetric: an under-declaration is hard to detect; an over-declaration is rare. Real estate is generally valued at official property-tax-roll values, which can be well below market.

U.S. proposals

The United States has not imposed a wealth tax at the federal level. Constitutional questions exist under the Sixteenth Amendment and under the apportionment requirement of Article I, §§2 and 9 — whether a wealth tax is a "direct tax" requiring apportionment by population. The Supreme Court's decision in Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. 572 (2024), addressed the realization principle in the context of the §965 transition tax and was watched closely for signals on a possible wealth-tax constitutional challenge; the Court resolved on narrow grounds without reaching the broad question.

Federal wealth-tax proposals have circulated in Congress for years. Senator Warren's Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act — introduced in 2019 and 2021 and most recently reintroduced in March 2026 — would impose a 2% annual tax on net worth above $50 million and an additional 1% (3% in total) above $1 billion. Senator Sanders has introduced parallel proposals. None has been enacted. State-level annual wealth-tax bills have been introduced in several states without enactment. In California, Proposition 40 (the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act initiative), a one-time tax of up to 5% on residents worth more than $1.1 billion, is on the 3 November 2026 ballot; its outcome is pending as of this review.

Elections and exceptions

Most wealth-tax jurisdictions offer specialized reductions:

Interaction with other regimes

Common planning approaches

Recent developments

The Spanish national "solidarity tax on great fortunes" enacted in 2022 was extended indefinitely by Real Decreto-ley 8/2023 and applies for 2026; it is the most prominent recent wealth-tax legislation alongside France's 2026 tax on sumptuary assets held in passive holding companies. The political driver was the perception that the autonomous-community variation in wealth-tax administration (particularly Madrid's rebate) had hollowed out the national tax.

Norway raised wealth-tax rates (introducing the 1.1% top band) and increased the valuation basis for shares in budget legislation for 2022 and 2023; the changes produced a much-reported wave of Norwegian high-net-worth resident departures to Switzerland.

The Netherlands' Box 3 deemed-return regime has been ruled by the Hoge Raad (Supreme Court) to violate the European Convention on Human Rights' protection of property where the deemed return exceeds actual return. Rulings of 24 December 2021 and 6 June 2024 require that the tax be limited to actual return where that is lower. The reform bill (Wet werkelijk rendement box 3), which would tax actual returns, passed the Tweede Kamer in February 2026 but is still pending in the Eerste Kamer; the government has said a 2028 start is uncertain and may slip to 2030.

Under Brazil's 2024 G20 presidency, a proposal (drawing on work by economist Gabriel Zucman) for a coordinated minimum tax of 2% of billionaires' wealth was debated; the November 2024 Rio de Janeiro Leaders' Declaration committed only to "engage cooperatively" to ensure ultra-high-net-worth individuals are effectively taxed. No implementing instrument has been adopted.

Primary Sources

  1. Swiss Federal Direct Tax Act and cantonal tax laws.
  2. Spain, Ley 19/1991 del Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio; Ley 38/2022 (solidarity tax on great fortunes).
  3. Norway, Skatteloven (Tax Act) Chapter 4 (wealth tax).
  4. Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. 572 (2024) — supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/602/22-800.
  5. OECD Model Tax Convention, Article 22 (capital).
  6. OECD, "The Role and Design of Net Wealth Taxes in the OECD" (2018) — oecd.org/tax.
  7. U.S. Senate, S.510 (117th Cong.), Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act of 2021 (reintroduced 2026).
  8. Spain, Real Decreto-ley 8/2023 (indefinite extension of the solidarity tax).
  9. France, Code général des impôts, art. 964 et seq. (IFI) and art. 235 ter C (tax on holding companies, Loi de finances pour 2026).
  10. Italy, TUIR art. 24-bis (flat tax for new residents), as amended by the 2026 Budget Law.
  11. Hoge Raad, Box 3 decisions (2021, 2024).

Reviewed October 2026