Tax·Luxury

Part III · Structures · No. 10

Dynasty trusts

A long-duration trust funded with GST exemption that compounds wealth across generations free of estate and GST tax. The choice of state situs — South Dakota, Delaware, Nevada — determines the trust's economic lifespan and its administrative environment.

What the structure is

A dynasty trust is an irrevocable trust drafted to last as long as state law allows — perpetually in several states that have abolished the rule against perpetuities, or for a defined statutory maximum (typically 360 to 1,000 years) in others. The trust is funded with all or part of the settlor's GST exemption, producing an inclusion ratio of zero. Distributions to beneficiaries — including beneficiaries two or more generations removed — proceed without further estate or GST tax.

The tax problem it addresses

Without a dynasty trust, wealth passing through three or four generations of a family pays transfer tax at each generation. With a properly structured and exempt dynasty trust, wealth grows in the trust without further transfer-tax cost until distribution or termination — potentially for centuries.

Mechanics

The applicable statutes and authorities

Substance and audit risk

Cost and complexity

Setup: experienced trust-and-estates counsel; institutional or individual trustee in situs state; potentially trust-protector designation. Annual: trustee fee (commonly 50-100 basis points for institutional trustees, lower for individual trustees with corporate co-trustee); annual income-tax compliance; potentially a state-level annual report. The administrative cost is meaningful but bounded.

Common combinations

Recent developments

The 2025-end sunset of the doubled exclusion is the dominant pending variable. Significant dynasty-trust funding through 2025 has been a priority for high-net-worth taxpayers. Anti-clawback regulations under §2010(c)(3) confirm pre-sunset gifts will not be recaptured.

Kaestner in 2019 limited the reach of state income tax on non-resident trusts based purely on beneficiary residence. State responses have been mixed; some states have continued to assert connection-based tax claims.

Competitive dynamics among trust-situs states have produced ongoing statutory innovations — directed trusts, silent trusts, asset-protection refinements, and trustee-licensing regimes.

Primary Sources

  1. 26 U.S.C. §§2601-2664 (GST tax).
  2. 26 U.S.C. §§671-679 (grantor trust rules).
  3. 26 U.S.C. §2010 (basic exclusion).
  4. Treas. Reg. §20.2010-3 (portability).
  5. South Dakota Codified Laws ch. 55-1.
  6. Delaware Code title 12, chs. 33-37.
  7. North Carolina Department of Revenue v. Kaestner, 588 U.S. 262 (2019).

Reviewed May 2026